Previous Page  25 / 30 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 30 Next Page
Page Background

www.

edises

.it

Chapter Two

Planning

73

is set to become a co-operative plan of formative interventions, the

school itself should aim at becoming a “community of laboratories”

co-ordinated with one another.

The latest studies on intelligence, memory and metacognition, as

well as the latest documents of the OSCE, agree on the fact that in-

dividuals, in order to live, must speak many languages; they must be

able to live with others in an intercultural dimension. To develop

the ability to learn throughout life, the school must help students to

grow their desire to know, learn, choose, and develop their attitude

to research and to carrying out activities by processing information.

To achieve this, it appears essential to create stimulating contexts,

open up to the territory and reach a “triangulation” between content,

methods of teaching and learning theories.

Through the proactive capacity that a school manages to express, in

fact, it may “activate” the surroundings, select its interlocutors, and

respond to their needs and expectations becoming a real cultural

entity operating in the territory.

In these years the irst school networks appeared, linked together to

achieve, by combining funds and resources, joint curriculum projects

that propose activities other than the traditional teaching, that are

able to respond to the needs of the speciic local realities and to mo-

tivate young people inding thus new forms of continuity, guidance

and prevention of dispersion.

Article 21 of Law 59/97 opened the way for the school autonomy;

the Regulation of autonomy has deepened and has ratiied the most

signiicant experiences occurred in recent years, even with reference

to curricular indications.

The Teaching Offer Plan, elaborated by the teachers´ college, on the

basis of the general guidelines deined by the Didactic Circle or Insti-

tute Board, after hearing the proposals of the various bodies (Article

3 of the Regulation), replaces the PEI and the Service Charter, thus

becomes the key document of each educational institution and deines

its cultural and planned identity. It also contains the curricular project

of the school. Autonomy puts an end to an education system based

on rigid planning, decided by central authorities, although the com-

pulsory curriculum, established at national level and covering almost

80% of the activities to be carried out, preserves the unitary nature of

the education system. Each school must indicate the compulsory share

of integrating activities freely chosen to achieve a speciic educational