Previous Page  23 / 30 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 30 Next Page
Page Background

www.

edises

.it

Chapter Two

Planning

71

one related to situation, modular teaching; despite the theoretical

differences, these curriculum models emphasise, to be achieved, the

need of a common transversal work between teachers of different areas

and schools.

This strong need for common work among teachers, underscored

by the latest theoretical studies on the processes of learning, is trans-

ferred on the ever increasing importance given to the educational

planning of the institute from the nineties.

The Law 148/90 on elementary schools, the CM 271/91, the recom-

mendations included in the Guidelines for kindergartens and in the

Brocca project for experimental high school, the CM 339/92 on the

continuity of education, all re-launched the importance of the educa-

tional

curriculum

that every school, collectively, had to develop, after

having analyzed the speciic needs of the area in which it operates, as

an integrating background against which all teachers had to coher-

ently deine their activities.

In addition to the

explicit curriculum

, i.e. the methodological-disci-

plinary choices that schools had to implement in order to contex-

tualise the content of the national programmes, at the beginning of

the nineties the following

curricula

became visible and a reason for

relection and conscious planning:

>

The

implicit curriculum

, in respect of the growth of the student as

a person and the development of his aptitudes, his learning styles

and his expressive, learning, decision-making skills which are con-

nected with the climate and the organisation of the educational

environment;

>

The

cross curriculum

, i.e. the acquisition by the pupil of all those skil-

ls that “pass through” the various subjects and the entire education

process, from primary school to higher education, such as listening

skills, understanding of a text, study skills which, not being exclu-

sive to one area or one type of study, must provide for common

planning moments. Such skills are an indispensable resource to

continue to learn, understand, study even after one leaves school.

During the programming/rating activities teachers have begun to

distinguish between achievements, skills and

masteries

acquired by

students, the latter intended as the capacity to know how to rework

and reuse the knowledge and experiences in different contexts. This

route involves the shift from “knowing” to “know-how” then going