Previous Page  14 / 20 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 20 Next Page
Page Background

www.

edises

.it

4

Parte Prima

Competenze disciplinari

Hostility to those who do not come openly to work is not new. Even in 2000,

before the asylum panic, just 12% believed that genuine refugees should be

accepted unreservedly — the lowest number in Europe. But Britons are more

blasé than other Europeans about the effect of immigration on national harmony.

Of those who reckon there are too many, only a quarter worry about racial

balance.

«

Britain has become a multicultural society; it just doesn’t want any

more people to come in,

»

says John Solomos, who follows the subject at City

University in London.

What seems to have happened over the past few years is that immigration has

become associated with refugees and illegal entrants rather than with migrant

workers. That is not surprising, given the rise in asylum claimants that began in the

late 1990s. Numbers are down, but it does not matter: perceptions have shifted.

A curious side-effect of this change is that the nation’s mental image of the

immigrant has taken on a different hue.

«

We traditionally thought of immigrants

as black and brown, and for 40 years they were,

»

says Mr Phillips. Unlike

America, where ethnic minorities and immigrants have always been viewed

as two different things, Britons regarded them as one and the same. Now

their attention has been drawn to paler arrivals who are often more disliked.

Romanians, who are often accused of living off the state, are less popular than

West Indians. Iraqis, who are not just refugees but also come from a country

where our boys are dying, are more loathed than either. Pakistanis (a well-

established but growing group) are disliked, too, probably because of fears of

domestic terrorism and memories of riots in 2001.

The fact that immigration has less to do with race only makes it easier to dislike.

Hostility used to connote racial prejudice, but no longer. That’s modern Britain:

multicultural, racially liberal and anti-immigrant to the core.

(

The Economist

, December 9th 2004)

1)

In the context of the article, the first paragraph:

A.

is a true picture of the British people’s attitude to immigration and

race relations

B.

is the opinion of the author of the article

C.

is how the world sees the British

D.

is a description of the British attitude to immigration and race rela-

tions which is difficult to defend

2)

According to the article, which one of the following statements

is TRUE?

A.

Londoners, young people and the middle classes have more liberal

views on immigration