Previous Page  24 / 28 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 28 Next Page
Page Background

www.

edises

.it

1.1

Learning: definition and theoretical core

references

Learning

, according to the de nition proposed by the psychologist

Ernest Hilgard,

is an intellectual process through which the individual ac-

quires knowledge about the world that he subsequently uses to structure and

guide his behaviour in the long run

.

Learning may be the result of spontaneous processes, as occurs in

children, such as with language, or it can be induced and guided

through outside teaching. Psychology and pedagogy are often con-

cerned with the learning processes, producing many and different in-

terpretational theories on learning, classi ed according to the great

schools of psychology of the 20th century. The main theoretical cores

in the research on learning are the behaviourism, the cognitivism

and the constructivism.

Behaviourism

is based on an association-like concept, considering

learning as a result of new combinations between stimuli and be-

haviour in response to stimuli. In this approach there is a learning

concept of summative type, which considers the subject as essentially

passive. What is being learned is a copy of the presented stimulus

therefore learning can be measured, on the one hand, by comparing

the behaviour acquired after the learning situation to the previously

presented one, and on the other hand, it can be evaluated according

to the criteria of quantity and accuracy of performance.

The authors of reference of the behaviourist approach are J.B. Wat-

son, I. Pavlov, E. Thorndike, B. Skinner.

The

cognitivist approach

moves away from the behaviourist models

shifting the focus away from the concept of association to that of an

active subject in working out the surrounding reality, better revealing

the internal processes of preparation and representation. If in the

behaviourist perspective learning is studied through the manifested

behaviour and treated as a “unitary” phenomenon, in the new cog-

nitivist perspective we notice a fragmentation of the scope of inquiry

and learning is rede ned in relation to the different cognitive com-

ponents involved. In particular, there is a strong association between

the study of learning and the study of memory, because, in order to

learn, you rst need to know how to encode, store, integrate and re-

member a set of information. So, since the information are processed

rst by the senses and then by memory, the projection of the training